Affordable Care Act And Bardachs Framework Discussion Response
Affordable Care Act And Bardachs Framework Discussion Response
Great Post Ogunleye! I agree with you that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) increases the accessibility of healthcare services among citizens by enhancing health insurance. The ACA offers healthcare consumers premium credits or subsidies for services that reduce the cost of services for households below the poverty level thus increasing their access to care (Courtemanche et al., 2018). For instance, the Medicaid Program was expanded to provide coverage for individuals with incomes below 138% of poverty levels (McIntyre & Song, 2019). Also, the ACA offers innovative support for the delivery of medical care methods that are designed to reduce the cost of healthcare services. However, some individuals still have limited access to healthcare services due to affordability or lack of awareness prompting the need for policy analysis to solve the existing health problems Affordable Care Act And Bardachs Framework Discussion Response.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Your description of the significance of adopting the Bardach framework for analyzing the affordable care act is exhaustive. However, I would like to highlight the efficiency, equality, and process values that are associated with the use of the Bardach framework in policy analysis. Firstly, the evaluation of ACA can be effectively attained since the framework offers a benefit-cost and cost-effective mechanism for policy analysis. According to the principle of efficiency, the ACA should be evaluated to determine if public interest or entire individual utilities are maximized using the policy. Secondly, the equity offered by the ACA should be determined to uphold the justice and fairness of using the policy in boosting service delivery (Engelman et al., 2019). Finally, the principle of process value is another parameter that is essential in the analysis of the ACA. The decision processes for change or designing healthcare policies in healthcare insurance should be part of the analytical work.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is an example of a healthcare policy in the US that seeks to improve access to healthcare by increasing the number of citizens with healthcare insurance. A policy analysis framework helps identify and understand the relationship between important variables relevant to the policy issue. The primary concern of policy analysis is the health policy outcomes or the policy’s impact on individuals (Masselink et al., 2021). The fact that a health concern requires an intervention shows that the existing health policy is ineffective. Thus, alternatives should be examined through policy analysis to address the health problem Affordable Care Act And Bardachs Framework Discussion Response.
I would use Bardach’s framework to analyze the ACA. I selected it because it provides step-by-step guidance for policy analysis and is valuable for professionals with limited time, resources, and experience in policy analysis studies. Besides, Bardach’s framework does not need sophisticated analysis methods since it focuses on the policy issue and can be used to accomplish the goal of policy analysis over a short time (Engelman et al., 2019). The framework comprises eight steps: Define the problem; Search and assemble evidence; Consider different policy options; Select the criteria; Predict the outcomes; Use evaluative criteria to confront trade-offs; Make the decision; Disseminate the results of the process (Engelman et al., 2019).
The Bardach framework offers an approach to address the common limitation in policy analysis of having insufficient data to support changes in practice, even though an important policy question has been identified. A policy analysis framework might also guide in analyzing the policy process and content (Masselink et al., 2021). It can be used to analyze policy formulation and the substance of policy. Policy content analysis explores a significant policy issue and the options to address this issue.
References
Engelman, A., Case, B., Meeks, L., & Fetters, M. D. (2019). Conducting health policy analysis in primary care research: turning clinical ideas into action. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000076
Masselink, C. E., LaBerge, N., & Detterbeck, A. (2021). Policy analysis on power standing systems. Preventive Medicine Reports, 24, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101601
References
Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., & Zapata, D. (2018). Effects of the Affordable Care Act on health care access and self-assessed health after 3 years. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 55, 0046958018796361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958018796361
Engelman, A., Case, B., Meeks, L., & Fetters, M. D. (2019). Conducting health policy analysis in primary care research: turning clinical ideas into action. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2). https://doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000076
McIntyre, A., & Song, Z. (2019). The US Affordable Care Act: Reflections and directions at the close of a decade. PLoS medicine, 16(2), e1002752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002752 Affordable Care Act And Bardachs Framework Discussion Response