Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment

Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment

Question One: Americans Dietary Guidelines

The dietary guidelines for Americans provide a concise review of the kind of food and drinks that promote health, meet nutrient needs and prevent disease occurrences. The guidelines have adopted strong causation evidence from the information provided since it acts as an interventional guideline. The main reason is that it involves collaboration between professional audiences by engaging the recent scientific review, proving that the information provided is more evidence-based than based on assumptions. In that case, the guideline uses a systematic review of controlled trials. For instance, in formulating the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, the professional audiences ensured that they reviewed different sodium trials before coming up with the appropriate DASH diet. Hence, if Americans follow the provided diet guidelines, they will improve their health and shun any occurrence of dietary-related diseases like obesity Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment.

PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE

Question Two: Article Analysis

1. Prostate Cancer Screening View

Tikkenin et al. (2018) enlighten the reader on the impacts that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has on men. The researchers prove men view PSA screening differently, which is why some are against the screening, and some have embraced the PSA screening. However, I think that there is a need to create awareness concerning prostate cancer screening since the early the problem is detected, the better chances the healthcare providers have to intervene in the problem. Such early interventions help in reducing the increased costs that the country incurs when treating advanced prostate cancer stages. That is because many men who fear cancer treatment and prognosis, especially those who have attained 45 years and above, may fail to have adequate information on why early screening will benefit their well-being and that of their family and friends.

1. US Guidelines on Prostate Cancer

As Tikkenin et al. (2018) indicate, the United States, through the US Preventive Services Task Force, states that the issue of prostate cancer screening should be individual-based without providing any clear stand on whether screening should be done or not. However, for the American Cancer Association. The organization states that men should not be coerced into prostate cancer screening unless informed of the main risks, uncertainties, and potential benefits. Hence, healthcare providers are obliged to stick to nursing ethics when dealing with the prostate screening issue. However, there will be a need to ensure that prostate cancer screening discussions take place when men are at 50 years and have average prostate cancer risks. Also, the discussion should occur at age 45 for men with a high probability of prostate cancer, especially family members like a brother or father with the disease. Also, the discussion should start at 40 years for men with higher prostate cancer risks, especially those with close family members like brothers or father that has had prostate cancer at an early age Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment.

Question Three: Observational Epidemiologic Study

The observational epidemiologic study is an aspect that involves the investigators’ observations of various factors within the study population but does not provide any intervention (Blonde et al., 2018). For instance, Tikkenin et al. (2018) project the US Preventive Services Task Force as more of an observational epidemiologic study since they use case controls, and cohort studies whose evidence level is low to come up with a conclusion on the issue of prostate cancer screening. That kind of study benefits the men since no one will force them to take prostate cancer screening without their will. However, the harm that such guidelines have included risking the men’s socioeconomic and health well-being. That is because, once they get prostate cancer, they will be in and out of hospital for treatment, which will affect their finances since any cancer type treatment is costly.

References

Blonde, L., Khunti, K., Harris, S. B., Meizinger, C., & Skolnik, N. S. (2018). Interpretation and impact of real-world clinical data for the practicing clinician. Advances in therapy, 35(11), 1763-1774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y

Tikkinen, K. A., Dahm, P., Lytvyn, L., Heen, A. F., Vernooij, R. W., Siemieniuk, R. A., … & Agoritsas, T. (2018). Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test: a clinical practice guideline. Bmj, 362. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3581

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2019). US Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans, The Eighth Edition. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/2015-2020_Dietary_Guidelines.pdf

Dear writer. Please read carefully and make 1-2 paragraphs for the questions below. Please make sure to read the materials carefully what the professor required to read and answers. Thank you.

 

1. Comment on where the Dietary Guidelines for Americans fit in the Pyramid of Evidence (see lecture slides) and briefly explain why.  Submit a Microsoft Word file with your comment.

For full credit, your answer should be at least one solid paragraph.

 

2. Based on this paper (copy and paste it into a browser: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30185545),please briefly answer both of these simple questions Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment:

 

1) Do you think that we should screen for prostate cancer in the US?  Why?

 

2) What are the recommendations in the US?  One solid paragraph for each question typically suffices

3. Give examples of where acting on observational epidemiological evidence has benefited public health and where it has harmed public health Interpretation And Impact Of Real-World Clinical Data For The Practicing Clinician Assignment.