Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion
Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion
Evidence Base in Design (Healthcare Policy): Reduced Costs and Continued Cures Act, or RCCCA
Healthcare policy is very important in streamlining and regularising the provision of healthcare services t the public. This is the reason why the nurse is also called upon to be an advocate and to actively engage in the politics of health (Milstead & Short, 2019; O’Rourke et al., 2017). One of the most famous and revolutionary of these policies in recent US history is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA 2010) or “Obamacare”. It is revolutionary because of the impact it has had on the common citizen and access to quality care. However, this paper has chosen to look at the more recent proposed policy referred to as the Reduced Costs and Continued Cures Act (RCCCA) aimed at cutting down the cost of prescription drugs Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion .
PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE
Description of the Health Policy Selected
According to the Rand Corporation (2021), prescription drug prices have steadily risen over time, to the degree where so many people seem unable to pay medications. When it comes to healthcare, the United States is known as one of the most expensive countries. Because there are just a few drug manufacturers, pharmaceutical corporations often control the market in a capitalistic manner. This gives them the authority to determine and manage the prices.
Brief Background for the Problem or Issue Being Addressed
One cannot talk about the background of this piece of healthcare policy without mentioning its proponents. These were Scott Peters (CA-52) and Kurt Schrader (OR-05) who were the sponsors and supporters of the bill to curb the rise in prescription drug prices. They introduced and sponsored the bill on September 14, 202. Scott Peters (CA-52) and Kurt Schrader sponsored and supported the bill for this cause because they saw that prescription drug prices were relentlessly going up. The legislative policy was called the Reduced Costs and Continued Cures Act, or RCCCA. Its main aim is to assist citizens who are sick to afford prescription medications in the American Healthcare System.
The Evidence Base to Support the Proposed Policy
There is enough evidence to show that there us support for this policy. The first and most obvious is the literature on the ACA 2010. It clearly states that the ACA 2010 was revolutionary in helping those who could not access healthcare to do so (Kominski et al., 2017). Likewise, this proposed policy would be revolutionary since many are struggling with the expensive prescription medications. The other example that can be given as supporting evidence is the literature that calls for universal healthcare or healthcare for all. This would guarantee each and every person in America some equity in the access, affordability, and reception of quality healthcare services (Cai et al., 2020). In all, therefore, there is enough evidence that supports this proposed policy Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion .
Conclusion
Healthcare policies have different impacts on the public. However, most of them are geared towards helping the public consume healthcare more affordably and effectively. This is the case of the Reduced Costs and Continued Cures Act, or RCCCA that was introduced by Scott Peters (CA-52) and Kurt Schrader in 2021.
References
Cai, C., Runte, J., Ostrer, I., Berry, K., Ponce, N., Rodriguez, M., Bertozzi, S., White, J.S., & Kahn, J.G. (2020). Projected costs of single-payer healthcare financing in the United States: A systematic review of economic analyses. PLOS Medicine, 17(1), 1-18. https://doi.og/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003013
Kominski, G.F., Nonzee, N.J. & Sorensen, A. (2017). The Affordable Care Act’s impacts on access to insurance and health care for low-income populations. Annual Review of Public Health, 38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044555
Milstead, J. & Short, N. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide, 6th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
O’Rourke, N.C., Crawford, S.L., Morris, N.S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154417728514
Rand Corporation (January 28, 2021). Prescription drug prices in the United States are 2.56 times those in other countries. https://www.rand.org/news/press/2021/01/28.html
Congress website provided in the Resources
Congress.gov | Library of Congress
- Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
- Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policyDiscussion 1: Evidence Base in Design
When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion .
In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy.
To Prepare:
- Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
- Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.
By Day 3 of Week 7
Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Rubric Detail
Excellent Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion .
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.
First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. Projected Costs Of Single-Payer Healthcare Financing Discussion